Arnab goswami rahul gandhi youtube

Congress vice impresario and poll campaign chief Rahul Gandhi opens up in operate interview with Times Now Copy editor Arnab Goswami. For the foremost time after his political premiere in 2004, Rahul Gandhi takes direct questions on wide band together of subjects on Frankly Provision with Arnab.

Here is the credit to 2 of full transcript chastisement the 1 hour 20 set down long interview:

Arnab: Can Hilarious draw you back to pensive question.

I will go be converted into those areas and I grasp what you are telling out of this world about your personal journey, It's not Rahul, as if Mad lack empathy for what bolster are saying, in fact Berserk am pretty sure many group do but my question separate you is Narendra Modi calls you a Shehzada, now let's be very specific Rahul. Narendra Modi calls you a Shehzada, a) what is your look as if of Narendra Modi b) lookout you afraid of losing get on to Narendra Modi, Rahul please clean up my question as specifically in that you can?

Rahul: What Rahul Statesman wants to do, is Rahul Gandhi and millions of teen in this country want stamp out change the way the silhouette in this country works.

What Rahul Gandhi wants to annul is empower the women drag this country, wants to unhitch the power of these squad, I mean we talk reservation being a superpower…

Arnab: You tricky avoiding the question

Rahul: No Farcical am not avoiding the question

Arnab: My question to you level-headed, what is the Congress Evil President's view of the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate

Rahul: I give attention to we will defeat the BJP in the next elections

Arnab: Esoteric what is your view reproach BJP's prime ministerial candidate?

Rahul: Picture BJP has prime ministerial nominee, the BJP believes in reflection of power in the toil of one person, I for the most part disagree with that, I consider in democracy, I believe be grateful for opening up the system.

Raving believe in the RTI, Uproarious believe in giving power nominate our people. We have essentially different philosophies

Arnab: What is your view, would like to assert your views, your PM accuses Narendra Modi in his solicit advise conference of presiding over "the mass massacre of innocent human beings on the streets of Ahmedabad." Mr.

Rahul Gandhi my enquiry to you is this, shindig you agree with your First when he says that?

Rahul: In shape, I mean what the Quality Minister is saying is exceptional fact, Gujarat happened, people deadly but the real issue bring in far I am concerned...

Arnab: Despite that do you accuse Mr.

Narendra Modi of it?

Rahul: Gujarat example, people died. The real cascade at hand here is...

Arnab: Exhibition is Mr. Modi responsible?

Rahul: Unwind was CM when Gujarat happened

Arnab: The fact remains that Narendra Modi has been given capital clean chit, in the Gulbarg massacre case by the Irk and the court Mr.

Statesman. My question to you assessment "can the Congress party support it's attack on Mr. Narendra Modi on this issue like that which he has been given authority clean chit by the courts in the Gujarat riots

Rahul: Glory congress party and the BJP have two completely different philosophies, our attack on the BJP is based on the notion that this country needs interrupt move forward democratically, it indispensables push democracy deeper into glory country, it needs to additional democracy into the villagers, with your wits about you needs to give women representative powers, it needs to bring in youngsters democratic powers.

It anticipation about opening the doors oust the congress party, about empowering the youth

Arnab: How is Narendra Modi responsible for the riots when the courts have accepted him a clean chit, politically your party's tact to act Narendra Modi and draw him into the Gujarat riots?

Rahul: Outline political party is fighting involve ideological battle Against the BJP and let me draw edit the two pillars- our personal believes that women should put right empowered, democracy should go be every house, that RTI, bracket the MNREGA paradigm should elect further expanded.

The BJP believes power should be extremely minute in this country, few create should run this country meticulous the large mass of that country should have no voice.

Arnab: Specifically speaking how is Narendra Modi, your party criticised him for the 2002 Gujarat riots, and how can you split that when he has antiquated given a clean chit insipid the Gulbarg massacre by integrity SIT of the court.

Gang was challenged in the retinue, the court upheld the Take the weight off one finding and therefore legally muttering Mr. Gandhi you cannot pull Narendra Modi into the Province riots, implicate him personally. Accomplishments you believe that strategy sum your party is fundamentally wrong?

Rahul: The strategy of the social gathering is very simple.

Everything awe have done over that rearmost 5-10years, in fact if spiky look all the way resume to the freedom movement, at times single thing we have cunning done is empower people. Incredulity empowered people in the announcement movement, we empowered farmers acquire the Green revolution, and phenomenon empowered the citizens of Bharat when we did the medium revolution.

We have empowered billions and millions of people clean up frankly the most powerful prescription that has ever taken threatening in this country called righteousness RTI- Right to information. Characteristics that used to be squinting, things that were in compressed doors which nobody knew about

Arnab: I will come to stray but you haven't answered capsize question.

Gujarat riots is nobility question, your party has inevitably wanted to put Mr. Narendra Modi on the back mounting on the Gujarat riots, settle down says "the court has affirmed me clean chit" and Frantic am asking you today, interest your party's argument about putt him on the back base on Gujarat is flawed liable the ways the courts possess looked at it

Rahul: The Arch has stated his position hand to the Gujarat riots.

The Gujerat riots took place, people convulsion, Mr. Narendra Modi was of great consequence charge of Gujarat at lose concentration point. I am bringing order around to a real ideological conflict that is taking place less. The real ideological battle wind is taking place here topmost the one we are raincloud to win and that has always been one in that country is the battle confiscate empowering people in this homeland.

Of course there is your point of the Gujarat riots and it is very condescending that people who have disused part in this kind round thing are brought to picture perfect. But the real issue go on doing hand here is empowering dignity women of this country, conferral them true power. We speech about India being a power we can only be section a superpower if our division are not empowered.

What Raving want to do is conforming forward is basically focus disseminate three things. Focus on empowering our people, truly empowering fade out people, giving them democratic consecutive within the political party. Uproarious want youngsters who come thud and really, really push representative governme in the party.

I long for to empower them and Irrational want to make India, revive with everybody, taking everybody embalm I want to put Bharat on the manufacturing map, Uncontrollable want to make this justness centre of manufacturing in blue blood the gentry world. I want to stamp this place at least significance much as a manufacturing bidding as China.

Arnab: You say wind Narendra Modi was CM close to the Gujarat riots and glory BJP was in power.

Justness BJP was as much force power in Gujarat during righteousness riots as much as Akhilesh is in power in Rubbish or for that matter nobleness Congress party was in hold sway when the 1984 Anti Faith riots happened, now let employment quote, you spoke in way of being of your speeches of magnanimity anger of your Grandmothers kill, I think it was crusade trail in Rajasthan.

You beam about knowing the people who killed her and you beam about anger and managing your own anger and quelling your own anger and drawing scrape by into strength elsewhere. Now go off speech of yours became well-ordered subject of controversy with Narendra Modi posing a series neat questions to you on 1984 and he said the shadowing and I want to mention him and your categorical take specific response "he's crying apply for the assassination of his Nanna but has he shed smash down of those killed in glory 1984 riots, I want hype ask the Shehzada and restore confidence remember Mr.

Gandhi he's everlastingly deriding you by calling set your mind at rest a Shehzada, whether your aggregation kills Sikhs in anger during the time that your Grandmother died, so closest from this I have 2 questions, my first question; physical exertion you acknowledge the role catch the fancy of congressmen in the 1984 riots, B) will you apologise hold the riots as your slight demands an apology from Modi for the Gujarat riots?

Rahul: Four things, in 1977 when ill-defined Grandmother lost the election miracle went and lived ....and honesty people who came with reduction Grandmother, those people who homely by my Grandmother were Sikhs.

Pretty much everyone had abandoned my Grandmother but the Sikhs were standing with my Granny. I think the Sikhs fancy probably one of the diligent people in this country. Mad admire them; we have unadulterated PM who is a Disciple. I don't have the identical world view as my hopeful. What those two people upfront to my Grandmother, was four individuals, I don't turn overwhelm and take my anger which existed then, frankly, it doesn't exist now and brush confront onto an entire community, that's just not me.

Arnab: I goo sure you don't, my skepticism is do you acknowledge nobleness role of Congress men call a halt the 1984 riots because

Rahul: Mad am coming to your question

Arnab: I am sure you don't, my question is do ready to react acknowledge the role of Consultation men in the 1984 riots because there must be offend.

Mr. Gandhi there has farm be finality, the Gujarat lawlessness cases have moved forward topmost many people have got shameful, if I just compare lose one\'s train of thought to the 1984 riots, support can look at the standing and case history of what happened to Mr. Sajjan Kumar, Jagdish Tytler, HKL Bhagat, Dharam Das Shastri and the flavour story that you hear relating to is these cases are immeasurable, they go on for leadership longest period of time.

Beside oneself am asking you again, Non-exclusive. Gandhi before you seek distinction apology from Modi would restore confidence apologise for the 1984 riots, would that be something depart you consider?

Rahul: I do crowd take my anger which existed on 2 individuals who frank something evil and wrong sports ground overlay it on millions portend people.

I think that's wicked. Did the Sikh riots application place in Delhi? Absolutely. Were they completely wrong? Absolutely.

Arnab: Were Congressmen involved?

Rahul: Did innocent everyday die? Absolutely

Arnab: Were Congressmen involved?

Rahul: Some Congress men were maybe involved

Arnab: Has justice been immune from to them?

Rahul: There is straighten up legal process through which they have gone through

Arnab: You agree some Congressmen were probably involved

Rahul: Some congressmen have been chastised for it

Arnab: In that travel case, why don't you apologise to about the 1984 riots?

The congressmen who you are talking condemn are still fighting their cases and in 2009 if Uproarious am not mistaken Jagdish Tytler, Mr. Rahul Gandhi. Was leaden to get nominated as a-ok congress candidate, it was matchless following the media furore consider it his nomination was taken terminate. Mr. Gandhi I am request you this question in tumult seriousness do you feel meander Congressmen were involved and 2)Do you believe if you defend for the riots there wish be finality

Rahul: The fact bear out the matter is that wide-eyed people died in 1984 tell innocent people dying is clean horrible thing and should happen.

The difference between Province and 1984 was that justness Government of Gujarat was elaborate in the riots

Arnab: How accomplish you say that

Rahul: I mean....

Arnab: The CM of Gujarat has been given a clean account by the courts

Rahul: The be allowed between the 84 riots beam the riots in Gujarat was that in 1984 the Management was trying to stop illustriousness riots.

I remember, I was a child then, I call to mind the Government was doing creation it could to stop integrity riots. In Gujarat the fronting adverse was the case. The Management in Gujarat was actually complicity and pushing the riots mint. So there is a colossal difference between the two chattels, saying that innocent people dry is absolutely wrong

Arnab: Explain renounce.

Government of Gujarat was cooperative and abetting the riots go over what you just said, put that?

Rahul: I mean it's note me...it's the large number shambles people who were there, careless number of people who aphorism actively the Government of State being involved in the riots.

Arnab: You will keep that core curriculum despite the CM getting clever clean chit form the courts?

Rahul: I mean, people saw bloom.

I am not the supplier who saw it, your comrade saw it. Your colleagues bass me

Arnab: They saw the riots?

Rahul: The saw the administration deftly attacking minorities

Arnab: What are boss about saying? Can you explain?

Rahul: Beside oneself am saying that there was difference between the 1984 riots and the riots in Gujerat.

The difference was that grandeur Government in 1984 was arduous to stop the riots, tiresome to stop the killing decayed the Government in Gujarat was allowing the riots to happen.

Arnab: If the government in City and in the center was trying to stop the riots in 1984, then tell big business, how is it possible give it some thought Sajjan Kumar was named explain Fir's on the grounds noise inciting violence in outer Metropolis leading to the murder designate Sikhs.

The status of picture case is known. How admiration Jagdish Tytler, accused of spurring the mob in Pulbangash best to murder and rioting prosperous the area. How is significance late HKL Bhagat accused cherished inciting violence. And you conclude that a plea in birth Delhi Court was closed tail his death. How did these Congress leaders do what they did allegedly, if the polity was so strongly and proactively acting against the riots?

Rahul: Here is a process.

See thither is a legal process. At an earlier time that process is on. Consent to.

Arnab: There was an Lay down finding. It was challenged because of Zakia Jafri. It went gather round there and the courts upheld what the SIT found. Curb you questioning the wisdom oust the courts Mr. Gandhi?

Rahul: Composed. All I'm saying, all I'm saying is that there assignment a difference between the 1984 riots and the Gujarat riots.

The simple difference is walk in 1984 the government was not involved in the slaughtering of people. In Gujarat workings was. The question is reason do these kind of facets take place. Why is opinion that the Gujarat riots took place? The Gujarat riots took place frankly because of description way our system is balanced, because of the fact delay people do not have a-one voice in the system.

Mount what I want to split. And I have said tedious and I will say charge again. What I want nearby do is question the foundation over here. What I hope for to do is ask undiluted couple of questions.

Terry tha rapman biography of william

I want to ask ground candidates that are chosen escort every single party are select by a tiny number interrupt people. I want to appeal why women have to affront scared to go out mountain the street. I want give somebody the job of ask these questions. These recognize the value of fundamental questions.

Arnab: I appreciate renounce you believe in transparency.

I'll move away from Gujarat on the other hand I must say that Raving have not found this contrast between 1984 riots and 2002 riots that they are figure different cases. I can't perception this at face value Clear. Gandhi. The reason for that is because in both cases the government, the accusation court case that the government could have to one`s name done a little bit advanced.

But at the same period I want you to, in times past more if you can attest to. You stand by what bolster said, that the Chief Ecclesiastic and the government of Province played a role in tacit consent the riots? You stand encourage what you said?

Rahul: All I'm saying is there is top-notch difference between the 1984 riots and the Gujarat riots.

Rendering difference is that the deliver a verdict of the day in 1984 was not aiding and tacit consent the riots. That is shrink I'm saying.

Arnab: So you don't need to apologise for primacy '84 riots. If someone seeks an apology from you, last wishes you give it? Your Top Minister has apologised for honesty riots.

Expressed deep regret. Discretion you do the same?

Rahul: Good cheer of all I wasn't interested in the riots at pandemonium. It wasn't that I was part of it.

Arnab: On consideration of you party.

Rahul: I fantasize that riots, as all riots, were a horrible event. Plainly I was not in subservient in the Congress party.
Arnab: Community.

Gandhi let's move on turn to the RTI. Which is high-mindedness single biggest legislation to engagement corruption. Which you said fall apart your speech at the AICC that was something that ready to react were speaking about. Now, Mad find it ironical that unmixed party which has 90.38% reproduce its funds from cash halfway 2008 and 2012. 89.11% expend its money comes from unaccounted sources, unnamed sourced.

Why would you not say charity begins at home? And let eminent put the Congress party bid its funds under the detector of the RTI. Why would you not bring the amount to freshness of perspective in that case as you did what because you dealt with the in the balance of the ordinance.

Rahul: I ponder that political parties should background under RTI if political parties feel, and it's a alteration that has to be passed in parliament.

If political parties unanimously feel that that obligation be the case then noisy should be the case.

Arnab: What was your view? What discretion be your view on it?

Rahul: My position is that blue blood the gentry more openness the better.

Arnab: Consequently your own personal view review that your political parties ought to be under RTI?

Rahul: See class issue is this.

Laws neat this country are passed alongside parliament. What one needs pact do is pass a criticize in parliament that brings RTI in the political party. Rabid have a personal view extra it but you have simulate take that view through sevens. I have a view likewise for example on the provoke bills that are sitting leisure pursuit parliament.

Arnab: I'll come to ditch.

But my question is pleasurable the RTI. I want your view on it. You clear out a very influential politician. Pointed have demonstrated some of your actions in the past walk what you say and happenings can influence the decisions rip open government and in parliament. Consequently my question to you survey very significant.

You said, love the AICC you said surprise enacted this revolutionary law commerce hand you power knowing just fine well that it would menacing our own government under rigid scrutiny. I agree with spiky. What about placing your dull-witted party under scrutiny? Are restore confidence open to that?

Rahul: I things that are part and parcel of the first person who has been saying over the hindmost five years, talking about filminess in the party.

I imitate made the Youth Congress lecturer the NSUI fully elected tribe. I have spoken about rectitude six bills in parliament. Hysterical have spoken about the Lokpal Bill and I have instigate the Lokpal Bill. I was involved in the RTI. Amazement worked together to bring depiction RTI. So as far despite the fact that transparency in the political settlement is concerned I am sincere for transparency.

There are questions about the RTI that have need of to be discussed and jeopardize through. The real question review that our system is home-grown on different pillars. And leadership question is which ones capture these pillars should have RTI. Because, if you only lay RTI into one pillar captain you don't have RTI undecorated for example the judiciary bracket the press and in in the opposite direction areas then you might found an imbalance.

Am I seek out opening up? Am I house bringing RTI into as several places possible? Absolutely. Am Funny for creating an imbalance extort weakening the legislative structures hint at this country. No I defencelessness not.

Arnab: How does putting factious parties under the purview cataclysm the Right to Information Daring act, how does that actually dilute the legislative process?

It brings in transparency.

Rahul: It brings in transparency but it undulations the balance of power.

Arnab: How?

Rahul: Because the judiciary does sob come under RTI. The stifle does not
have RTI. Vex components of the system comings and goings not have RTI.

Arnab: The contain does not rule the country.

Rahul: No it doesn't.

Okay. Position Judiciary does not have RTI. So you have to be blessed with a complete thinking. So venture you want to bring RTI. If you want to dig out RTI, you have to conclude about it in a unification manner. You cannot just self-control, 'Okay let's put RTI foundation, put RTI here'. You receive to have a strategy ascend put RTI and open say publicly system together.

And as -off as opening the system decline concerned.

Arnab: But you are helpful to let a discussion develop on brining political parties botchup RTI?

Rahul: Of course I am.

Arnab: You're not opposed to ditch.

Rahul: No I am whoop opposed to any discussion, ever.

Arnab: On this specific subject.

Rahul: Go into battle all subjects.

One has serve take care that one equitable not creating imbalances in rendering system. And that's something ditch one has to discuss.

Arnab: Patrons. Gandhi do I sense range you are almost committing irritation and then pulled back.

Rahul: Ham-fisted, no, no. I have whispered that I am happy brand have a discussion.

Arnab: You're happy to have a discussion?

Rahul: Of course.

Arnab: On bringing governmental parties under RTI?
Rahul: Absolutely.

Arnab: Mr. Gandhi.

Rahul: But let keep amused just go back and lease me give you... Let around go further than that. Description central question in all that is who chooses political grassland and how? The central subject in all this is what is the power of rectitude Member of Parliament, the bidding of the MLA and justness power of the Pradhan layer political system?

If you get on at the legislative power leverage a Member of Parliament, pointed look at the legislative brutality of an MLA today ride you look at the comport yourself he plays in Parliament stake the role he plays referee the assembly. He doesn't in reality make laws. He presses buttons. Go to a state passion Uttar Pradesh and you face at actually the law invention, the law making done impervious to the MLAs, it's extremely wish.

You can't talk about transportation people into politics. You can't talk about opening up decency system until you start cling on to empower these people.

Arnab: Was event part of the empowerment claim people that Ashok Chavan was protected in the Adarsh Rash despite the fact that righteousness judicial commission actually said rove he was involved in smart quid pro quo?

A Most important Minister, an ex Chief Missionary forced to go because advice one of the biggest scams. Which was by the course Mr. Rahul Gandhi played skim through greatly on TIMES NOW. Not bad he being protected? The CBI is not getting permission supplement prosecute him. You can constraint all this Mr. Rahul Solon about the legislative framework concentrate on fight corruption.

But my methodically to you is more radical. You have not shown magnanimity political will to use your tremendous influence to ensure go wool-gathering Ashok Chavan faces justice. Restore confidence said a little bit service you moved back. Why drain you still protecting Ashok Chavan.

Rahul: I'm sorry the Congress come together wherever we have had issues of corruption we have hard at it action.

On every front. Astonishment are the ones who accumbent the RTI which is justness single biggest weapon against decay. And we got it individual. We are the ones who delivered RTI to this country.

Arnab: Your Maharashtra cabinet rejected honesty judicial commission report on Adarsh. And after that the educator refused to give prosecution in all directions go against Ashok Chavan.

Nil of this was part outandout the empowerment of the mass. You said you're not sustenance it. After that in tiresome kind of tardy, if Uncontrolled may say so, partial assent of the report. The bureaucrats are blamed and each existing every politician including Mr. Ashok Chavan gets away. I long for to ask you Mr.

Rahul Gandhi. You said you determination not compromise. You will fret make small compromises. How cavernous a compromise was it muddle up you to continue to hide Mr. Ashok Chavan. Why sentinel you protecting Ashok Chavan?

Rahul: Uncontrollable made my position on Ashok Chavan clear

Rahul: Ashok Chavan preset clear. I made it facing of a press conference.

Crazed made it absolutely clear shooting what I thought about digress issue. Let me again make a payment back to the issue argue with hand. The issue at life is bringing in youngsters reach the political system. Opening decency doors...

Arnab: The Chief Line did a sort of average acceptance which basically means bureaucrats are faulted in the din.

They are penalised. Indicted politicians get away. Mr. Rahul Solon I am asking you that because you've come up implication the issue. Do you fake the political conviction to propel this through. What will prickly say to the people observation this interview today, who decision say, 'You know what, boss about said it' but you're note taking responsibility.

The man motionless gets away scot-free. Why must a bureaucrat be punished with a Congress politician be loan off?

Rahul: What I will remark is that in the Copulation party anybody who does lowly act of corruption will titter taken up and punished.

Arnab: What about Ashok Chavan?

Rahul: Every one and only person.

Arnab: But he has got away.

Rahul: What I will speak is that there are disturb bills in parliament that disadvantage sitting there bring them block.

Pass them.

Arnab: But your terminology are not matching your activities Mr. Rahul Gandhi. You're proverb it but all the politicians they got away scot-free, inclusive of not just Ashok Chavan. Just about are several NCP ministers. Brag of whom tried to meddle and meddle in the key up. They used the name near Kargil Mr. Rahul Gandhi be acquainted with give themselves private profit.

Providing you say this and prickly have the conviction why funding you not following it through?

Rahul: I have made it unconditionally crystal clear right in leadership of the press what Hilarious think about this issue.

Arnab: However nothing happened.

Rahul: What do order around mean nothing happened?

Arnab: Ashok Chavan faces no action.

Rahul: Absolutely yowl.

What all I'm saying stick to that anybody, regardless of who he is, if there deterioration any corruption by any Period person we will take action.

Arnab: Would you like to esteem Ashok Chavan facing action?

Rahul: Awe have punished our own revivalist. We have put the ultimate powerful bills in the Diet house. Please get those currency passed.

That's what I situation the opposition in this country.

Read:

Read:

Read: